Asset Details

Identifier:
ele12289-fig-0003

Description:
Relationship between species phylogenetic distance (in millions of years) and their (a) average fitness differences and its two components: (b) demographic differences and (c) competitive response differences. Lines show the best fit non‐linear curve from Appendix S6. The statistical significance of the relationships between species' phylogenetic distance and their (a) fitness difference (r = 0.17, P = 0.018), (b) demographic difference (r = 0.10, P = 0.092) and (c) competitive response difference (r = 0.19, P = 0.013) comes from separate Mantel tests that properly account for the lack of independence among species pairs but assume linearity and are not fixed through the origin. Note the log transformation of the fitness differences, which were absolute valued before plotting.

License:
Rights Managed

Rights Holder:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

License Rights Holder:
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS

Asset Type:
Image

Asset Subtype:
Chart/Graph

Image Orientation:
Landscape

Image Dimensions:
981 x 705

Image File Size:
136 KB

Creator:
Oscar Godoy, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Jonathan M. Levine, Jerome Chave

Credit:
Adler, P. B., HilleRisLambers, J., Levine, J. M., Allan, E., Jenkins, T., Fergus, A. J., Roscher, C., Fischer, M., Petermann, J., Bennett, J. A., Lamb, E. G., Hall, J. C., Cardinal‐McTeague, W. M., Cahill, J. F., Best, R. J., Caulk, N. C., Stachowicz, J. J., Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., Ives, A. R., Burns, J. H., Strauss, S. Y., Cahill, J. F., Kembel, S. W., Lamb, E. G., Keddy, P. A., Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., Kembel, S. W., Chesson, P. L., Chesson, P., Chesson, P., Darwin, C., Diez, J. M., Sullivan, J. J., Hulme, P. E., Edwards, G., Duncan, R. P., Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D., Rambaut, A., Elton, C., Fritschie, K. J., Cardinale, B. J., Alexandrou, M. A., Oakley, T. H., Gause, G. F., Godoy, O., Levine, J. M., Grinnell, J., Harper, J. L., HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P. B., Harpole, W. S., Levine, J. M., Mayfield, M. M., Hutchinson, G. E., Jiang, L., Tan, J., Pu, Z., Kembel, S. W., Hubbell, S. P., Levine, J. M., HilleRisLambers, J., Liu, X., Liang, M., Etienne, R. S., Wang, Y., Staehelin, C., Yu, S., Lloret, F., Medail, F., Brundu, G., Camarda, I., Moragues, E., Rita, J., Losos, J. B., Maherali, H., Klironomos, J. N., Mayfield, M. M., Levine, J. M., Mills, K. E., Bever, J. D., Narwani, A., Alexandrou, M. A., Oakley, T. H., Carroll, I. T., Cardinale, B. J., Ojeda, F., Pausas, J. G., Verdú, M., Paradis, E., Park, D. S., Potter, D., Thuiller, W., Gallien, L., Boulangeat, I., Bello, F., Münkemüller, T., Roquet, C., Tilman, D., Violle, C., Nemergut, D. R., Pu, Z., Jiang, L., Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2014). Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. Ecology Letters, 17(7), 836-844..